Natural Law vs. Positivism

Gargoyles on Minshull Street
Source: Flickr

The approach of law is a complex and in depth study, which requires an intimate understanding of the legal procedure in general along with a philosophical mind.
For centuries, the scope and nature of law has been discussed and argued from numerous view points, and intense intellectual discussion has actually occurred from the basic concern of ‘exactly what is law’. In action, several major schools of thought have been born, which the natural law scholars and positivists are 2 of the most notable. These two camps hold strictly contrasting views over the function and function of law in particular situations, and have actually supplied in themselves platforms for criticism and discussed which continue to matter today.

Although the classifications of natural law and positivism are frequently utilized, it is very important to remember that they cover a really wide range of scholastic opinion. Even within each camp, there are those veering to more liberal or more conservative understandings, and there is also naturally a grey area. Having said that, academics and theorists can be enveloped by among the classifications on the basis of specific basic concepts within their works and viewpoints.

Natural law has actually constantly been connected to ultra-human considerations, that is to say a spiritual or moral impact factor of their understandings of the method law runs. Among the founding concepts is that an unethical law can be no law at all, on the basis that a government requires ethical authority to be able to legislate. For this factor, natural law theories have been utilized to validate anarchy and disorder at ground level. This had actually resulted in widespread criticism of the natural law concepts, which have had to be improved and developed to fit with modern-day thinking. On the other hand, natural law has actually been used as a conclusive method of serving ‘justice’ to war wrongdoers and former-dictators after their reign.

A few of the greatest criticisms of natural law have actually come from the positivist camp. Positivism holds at its centre the belief that law is not affected by morality, however in essence is the source of ethical considerations. Due to the fact that morality is a subjective idea, positivism recommends that the law is the source of morality, and that no extra-legal considerations ought to be taken in to account. Positivism has been criticised for permitting extremism and unjustified actions through law. It has actually also been recommended that positivism in its strictest sense is flawed because it ignores the depth and breadth of language in legal enactment, which indicates the favorable law can be checked out in various lights based on differing significances of the very same word. Despite this, positivism has been viewed as among the essential legal theories in the advancement of modern-day legal philosophy over the last few decades, and is winning prevalent favour through a modern scholastic revival.

Natural law and positivism have been the subject of an ongoing academic debate into the nature of law and its function within society. Both respective legal schools have actually criticised and built on one and others theories and principles to produce a more advanced philosophical understanding of the legal construct. Although the argument is set to continue with a new generation of promising legal theorists, both natural law and positivism have actually gotten widespread regard for their consistency and close analyses of the structure of law.


Word Count 556