Landscape Designer Liability Law Source: Flickr The lability law stresses that an individual who wishes to be signed up as a landscape designer should complete at least 18 years and must have an ethical character. He she needs to have passed a defined test and needs to have gotten a professional degree in Landscape architecture.
Landscape Designer Liability Law
The lability law stresses that an individual who wishes to be signed up as a landscape designer should complete at least 18 years and must have an ethical character. He she needs to have passed a defined test and needs to have gotten a professional degree in Landscape architecture. He she should finish any of the following requirements to get legal registration to practice as a landscape designer:
* Complete at least 3 years of useful experience in a workplace or under a registered landscape architect.
* Complete specified type of internship which is accepted by the state board of landscape designer examiners.
Now there is a change in the law that the applicant who picks the first criteria requires to finish 3 years of practical experience in an office and under the signed up landscape architect.
The landscape liability law specifies that certificate of permission to use landscape architecture services can be provided to the corporation only when the individuals owning 50% of shares in that corporation and more than 50% of interests in the corporation are professional engineers, property surveyors and landscape designers.
The landscape architect liability law permits the state board of landscape architects to establish cost to cover the expense for checks and other instruments returned by banks due to insufficiency of funds.
The law removes the requirement that the board hold evaluations for applicants to practice as a landscape architecture not less than once every year. It also eliminates the requirement to consist of designer’s business on the architect’s certificate of credentials.
The Bambi theory of liability was come from New Jersey which specifies that the landscape architects were accountable to recoup the expense of landscaping lost to the most voracious herbivore, white tailed deer. This theory stresses that the landscape designer have a responsibility to guidance their clients that deer are most likely to take in the costly planting they specify to be planted on large locations.
If the landscape architect fails to guidance the client about this, the customer can then can recuperate the cost of landscaping lost. However this theory is declined by lots of people especially by the landscape architects and their legal representatives. Thus a contract stipulation is included in this theory of liability.
The new landscape architect liability law specifies that as no plant is deer proof, the landscape designer is not accountable to pay back the owner the expense of landscaping lost due to deer damage. Nevertheless the landscape designer would have to offer the list of landscape plants which are ranked as resistance to deer damage. This helps the landscape architect prevent himself from any of the legal actions.
The landscape architect liability law recommends some expert liability of a landscape designer. Since a little omission or error can bring a legal action versus the landscape architect, he she has to follow the professional liability strictly.
In truth the actual responsibility of a landscape designer is to protect the natural resources and to design and prepare for environmentally friendly projects. The landscape architect for that reason needs fulfilling his obligation as per the law.